Scenario Analysis In Washington D
In Washington D.C. there are three citizens named Herman, Jed and Jane were accused of entering a bank and stealing over $65,000. Herman and Jed had weapons and used them in the robbery, no one was hurt though; Jane drove the getaway car. The three suspects were arrested after being pulled over for speeding to get out of the state. Two out of the three suspects matched what a witness described to them, the men denied being involved and Jane admitted to it. The cops found about $25,000 of the $65,000 but could not conclude if the money was taken from the bank. Jed was convicted of a different crime before. The police and FBI took on the case. The lawyers for the suspect asked that the case get put off for a few months. The district attorney objected to it, claiming an overflowing docket, and claims that if the courts grant an extension, then the prosecuting attorney should delay in turning over the leftover findings. The suspects lawyer argued that their clients have a right to a well-planned justification. The judge had so a lot to do and wanted to begin the case right away.
The courts, like many government systems, contain ranks. Federal, state and local courts continue, each doing identical but and frequently parallel meaning(CivilRights.org,2016). The difference is that federal courts examine cases connected to laws supported by the government, i.e., U.S. Congress discussed regulations that are approved by the state law and local guidelines. Although federal courts manage only issues that are connected to the United States constitution.
It is necessary to have separate systems because valid federal laws may displace state laws or reverse. An example of this is, in current years, weed has been illegal in many states, like Massachusetts. Weed however is believed to be an illegal drug by the government of the United States, even though conflicts continued among federal and state laws, federal generally carried extra weight, and unsolvable conflicts among them usually were heard by the U.S. Supreme Court (CivilRights.org,2016). Police officers from the FBI and local divisions (the D.C. Police who pulled over the burglars for speeding) are involved in the investigation that includes the three suspects, this probably is an issue on how all three are criminally treated.
Nevertheless, all banks that are robbed are federal cases. Considering since all banks are protected by the United States Government and are reviewed by the FBI even if criminals are not in other jurisdictions. In this case this is a concern of judgement (e.g. a few contributors were armed, one wasn’t), one robber is a convicted criminal, considering the larger efficiency of the commonly less-weighed down, improved financed federal system (FindLaw,2017, Person,2016).
Regarding the venue with federal protocol, this case will go to trail in a federal court in the jurisdiction of Columbia, where the crime took place (Jumes,2016). This was in affect because the crime was a one-time situation that happened in an obvious physical area instead of a continuous series if criminal occurrences involving individuals in many locations (a Ponzi Scheme or other financial malfeasance being an example of the latter). Suggestions of a “fair trail” affects a possible bias brought in by choice of venue may not, therefore requested in this investigation, even though in a lot of federal crimes this is a necessary concern (Jumes,2016).
The suspects face offenses rom bank robbery and major felony charges if found guilty all of them could face 10 to 25 years (Federal Crimes Laws,2016). The two men face sentences longer, due to having weapons but one of them also may get a longer sentence then the other two being that he is already a convicted felon.
Without any doubt giving a description of sentencing guidelines are essential to balance the working of the federal court system, as an excess caution in the area on the judges’ part it could slow the method down by giving the defense lawyer more reason to discuss and question a judges’ verdict for many reasons.
Jumes, S. (2016). Where Will a Federal Criminal Case Be Prosecuted? Retrieved June 18th, 2018, from http:/ www.versustexas.com/federal-criminal-defense/venu-in -federal-criminal-cases
CivilRights.Org: Difference between Federal courts and State/ Local Courts (2017). Retrieved June 18th, 2018, from http:// www.civilrights.org/judiciary/courts/difference-federal-local-courts.html
FindLaw: Federal vs. State Courts-Key Differences (2017). Retrieved June 18th, 2018, from http://litigation.findlaw.com/legal-system/federal-vs-state-courts-key-differences.html
Federal Bureau of Investigation: Bank Robbery (2016). Retrieved June 18th,2018, from http://www.fbi.gov/investigate/violent-crime/bank-robbery
U.S. Courts: Criminal Cases (2017). Retrieved June 18th, 2018, from http:// www.uscourts.gov/about-federal-courts/types-cases/criminal -cases
Cornell University School of Law. (November 30, 2011). Rules 26, Duty to disclose; General provision governing discovery. Retrieved June 18th, 2018, from http//: www.lae.cornell.edu/rules/frcp/rule_26
Person, C. (2016). Difference between Federal Criminal Case be Prosecuted? Retrieved June 18th, 2018, from http://www.carlperson.com/differences.php
Gorman, T. (1972). Excessive Delay in the Courts: Toward a Continuance Policy Relating to Counsel and Parties. Retrieved June 18th, 2018 from http:// engagedscholarship.csuohio.edu/CGI/viewcontent.cgi? article